Sayings of a Suns Sensei

A blog on all things under the Phoenix Sun

Posts Tagged ‘Mike D’Antoni’

Suns v. Nuggets Outdoors

Posted by thesandman1515 on October 14, 2008

So, I drove up to the Suns’ preseason game at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden this weekend – the first modern NBA outdoor game. It was a Suns home game, so the Ced Ceballos, the Gorilla, the Suns dance team and the Adio Sol Patrol were out in full force. Suns fans were spread across the arena with very few Nuggets fans dotted in. (The Nuggets fans I saw all seemed to be fairly happy about their team’s win. Congrats.)

The offense was stagnant. There were times when the team would push the ball, mostly after a defensive stop. There were probably less than five times the team ran. Which is no necessarily a bad thing, as long as the halfcourt offense is strong. But its not right now. Far from it. Instead of scoring in seven seconds or less, it would sometime take that long to swing the ball around the perimeter. At the beginning of the game especially, there was an effort to get the ball into the post. I’m not sure the Suns scored on any of these plays. I do remember Shaq throwing the ball away trying to deliver the ball to a cutter. The offense looked a lot like something you might see in a high school game. The base set is very spread out, with four players on the perimeter, who then cut through the lane. Several screens are set, including a double screen to free up a corner three for a wing player. Generally, it seemed pretty one dimensional. No drives baseline. No drives into the paint. Not many pick and rolls, but that’s a lot harder without Amare.

What made the Suns’ offense special wasn’t pushing the ball after every made basket. Any team with speed can do that, and many have tried unsuccessfully. The key was Nash. (I’m already referring to D’Antoni’s offense as dead.) Any point guard can push the ball up the court with success. It was his impact on the half court game that was unique, though most have criticized the Suns “slow-down” game in the past.

It’s not a horrible thing that Nash is being restrained. The time is fast approaching when he will no longer be with the Suns. The Suns need to prepare for that day, hopefully without sacrificing winning now. If Porter can instill a more structured offense, it may help some of the younger players who will have to adjust to the post-Nash era in a few years.

Nash’s heir apparent played about as well as I expected him too. He was a bit timid with the ball, but I believe Dahntay Jones and Anthony Carter were pressuring him most of the game, and they’re both pretty pesky. After seeing him play, I can say that he does a pretty good job of staying in front of his man, and he’ll hustle. His shot doesn’t look too bad mechanically, but it doesn’t go in very often. He had a few nice plays where he penetrated and found an open man. The year will be a learning process with him, so anyone who expects him to play like the #2 point guard in the draft or someone earning as much as a lottery pick will be disappointed. He won’t be any worse than Marcus Banks, so that’s a plus. Over the next few years he should develop into a solid starting point guard.

The one good thing on offense is that we have energetic post players. Robin Lopez and Louis Amundson crashed the boards frequently, though it doesn’t show up in RoLo’s rebounding stats.

Defensively, it would seem that the Suns have made great strides since the last few seasons, but I’m not sure that’s true. Sure, the points allowed stat may have gone down, but when has a Suns fan ever taken much stock in that deceptive stat. If my math is correct, and it always is, through the first three preseason games (one of the best indicators of post-season success), the Suns have allowed a 42% opponent FG%. Which is only about a 3% drop from their average over the past four years. First, let me say that those 3% points are the difference between an average defensive team and a team that is lauded for their defense. The kind of defense that wins champioships. That said, two of the team’s three worst defenders haven’t been playing. Their best defensive efforts thus far have come against teams missing Carlos Boozer, Carmelo Anthony and Allen Iverson. So no, I’m not ready to say the Suns will be a top 7 team on defense this season.

The Suns did swarm the ball well whenever it came into the paint. The help defense looked like it had only rarely during Dantoni’s reign. The man-to-man defense looked essentially the same. Nash was slightly better in forcing his man to help. Robin Lopez did a solid job defending his man in the post, though I wouldn’t call him a defensive “stopper” by any mean, at least not the way Kurt Thomas was. But man defense really wasn’t the problem. With Bell, Marion and  Kurt Thomas on the floor, the Suns had three superior defenders. That’s pretty good. Look at the Spurs. Bruce Bowen is a fantastic defender. Tim Duncan is solid. Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, and whoever else are solid, but not spectacular. Their team defense concept was beter than the Suns’. I know Nash and Stoudemire’s individual defensive liabilities played a major role in this as well, but it’s not as if Parker was able to stop Nash or and Spur was able to contain Amare during the playoffs. The biggest difference is in the defensive schemes, where the Spurs were worlds better than the Suns.

Posted in NBA | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nash: Four More Years!

Posted by thesandman1515 on October 6, 2008

No, he doesn’t support George W. in office for a third term. I don’t think. But he is following in teammate Shaquille O’Neal’s size 23 footsteps by setting a tentative retirement date. Nash told the East Valley Tribune that he wanted to sign another two-year contract after his current one run out.
I don’t know if this is good news or bad news. Nash will still be a solid player in a few years. Not all-star caliber most likely, but he could form a strong PG rotation with Goran Dragic if everythig works out. Bad news is that he could sign somewhere else. You know D’Antoni will sign him if he’s still in New York at that time. Nash may decide that Terry Porter’s relatively grueling practices are too much for him. Maybe the Suns will lowball him. Maybe he’ll decide that he just needs a change of scenery. Who knows? But I think it would be a shame if Steve Nash doesn’t end his career with the same team he began it with.

Posted in NBA | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Porter Looks to Slow Run and Gun

Posted by thesandman1515 on October 2, 2008

That’s what the headline reads for Paul Coro’s article in the Arizona Republic. It freaked me out. Then I went on to read the article to see if it wasn’t just a slightly sensational headline designed for me to click on the article. But it’s not. “From what I’ve seen so far it’s very different, but he’s not going to throw everything at us at once,” forward Grant Hill told the Republic in the article. “It’ll be interesting to see if we totally get away from some of the old stuff.”

That sounds like a pretty big change. Especially since over the past month all Porter and Kerr have been talking about is how the team will still light up the scoreboard. But then, how much more do the Suns fastbreak than other teams? When I think of the “essence” of the Suns’ offense in the D’Antoni years, Marion and Barbosa streaking ahead of the pack isn’t what comes to mind. It’s Steve Nash driving baseline and passing the ball out to the three-point line.

Let’s take a quick look at the stats. In an article by Roland Beech from 82games.com, statistics show the Suns scored about 17 points off fast breaks in the ‘06-’07 season, with a 6.5 point net fastbreak average. That doesn’t take into account for points drawn on fouls, and the definition of fast break can be somewhat nebulous when tallying stats, but it will suffice for our purposes. The net fastbreak average shows that the Suns only had about three more buckets each game from the fastbreak. Not that impressive.

The real issue here is the motion offense Porter is installing. I think it’s a good idea in the long run, since it will help prepare the team for the post-Nash era somewhat. I don’t know how much good it will do this season though. The reason that the Suns’ offense has been so anemic with Nash on the bench over the past few years is that Nash is the offense. It’ll be interesting to see just how much Porter lets Nash freelance when he’s on the floor. Restrain Nash, and the offense becomes relatively mediocre. And if there’s not a significant change in a mediocre defense, the Suns could be in some trouble.

Posted in NBA | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Can Suns Afford to Bench Nash?

Posted by thesandman1515 on September 1, 2008

Steve Nash Wheaties box, best used 23FEB07

Steve Nash Wheaties box, best used 23FEB07

I read an article East Valley Tribune reporter Scott Bordow wrote last week about how Nash doesn’t know if the Suns will be good enough to sit him for a dozen games next season. “If you can get to the postseason well rested, it’s perfect,” Nash tells Bordow. “But you can’t always afford to do that.” It’s been Steve Kerr’s plan for quite a while now to rest Nash for about a dozen games this season. To this end, he traded up in the draft to get Goran Dragic and recently swung a deal to acquire Sean Singletary, who was taken a few spots ahead of Dragic. And as self-centered as it may sound to suggest that the Suns can’t win without him, Nash has two MVP trophies that back up his claims. Not that I think he is self-centered in any way – he has a pretty extensive track record that suggests otherwise.

I don’t think that Nash is saying the Suns’ new rookie PGs aren’t good enough to hold his jock strap, but realistically the Suns aren’t going to have a large margin of error for making the playoffs. Sure, the Celtics won a championship last year with Rajon Rondo starting, but they had the Big 3 who could create their own shots if the second-year guard was struggling. O’Neal has trouble doing that now, and Stoudemire, Barbosa, Diaw, and Hill are pretty inconsistent. Plus, the Celtics were playing in the Eastern Conference, where the lowly Atlanta Hawks made the playoffs with a losing record. Of course, those same Hawks took the Celts to 7 games i the first round, even with self-proclaimed “World’s Best Player” Paul Pierce playing injury-free. But I digress.

So if the Suns will be hard-pressed to make the playoffs this year in a tough Western Conference, can they really afford to sit Nash for 12 games? Maybe. I suppose it depends on who they rest him against. Against the Bucks, T-Wolves, and Grizzlies, Nash shouldn’t have to play for the Suns to win. He’s not the same player he was a few years past, when the Suns struggled against the scum of the league without him. If the rest of the team can’t post a winning record against such teams without Nash’s help, the Suns’ championship hopes are awfully dim.

I suppose another school of thought asks why Nash needs to be removed from games entirely. Wouldn’t it be enough to just lower the minutes he plays per game? Surely Dragic and Singletary can fill in for a quarter and a half each game. I tend to subscribe to former coach Mike D’Antoni’s way of thinking. Does five minutes a game really matter to a world-class athlete? Will he really be that much more rested for the playoffs if he sits on the bench a few minutes less each game?

I think Kerr’s plan to sit Nash is a good idea, assuming of course the games are strategically chosen. I don’t think it would be wise to sit Nash the final 12 games of the season. And as much as this plan has to do with winning his season, it also has a great deal to do with the Suns’ future. Stoudemire needs to prove he can win without Nash, and either Dragic or Singletary need to show themselves capable of starting in the NBA. The Suns need to start preparing for life without Nash. Take a break, Steve Nash. The team afford to play a few without you this season. The question is, can they really afford not to?

Posted in NBA | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »